In vitro 3D Spheroid Wound Modeling: An Alternative to Experimental Animal Studies

Authors

  • Esila Ece Akkaya ESİLA
  • Oğuz Kul

Keywords:

In vitro, Animal testing alternative, Experimental Spheroids , Wound modeling, 3D cell culture

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Laboratory animals have frequently been used in scientific and preclinical pharmaceutical drug safety and efficacy research. Although the introduction of new in silico assays and computer modeling for drug discovery has shown promise in reducing laboratory animal trials, there is still a need to develop in vitro alternatives to in vivo animal models. The in vitro spheroid wound model is one of the best options for developing alternative techniques to animal research as it is the most widely used laboratory animal model. The aim of the study is to using 3D in vitro wound modeling as an alternative to in vivo wound healing assays. In the study, a three-dimensional cell culture (organoid culture) with cell/cell and cell/matrix junctions was generated using the most common Fibroblast and HaCaT cell lines hanging drop technique to replicate the healing stages in the injured skin area. After spheroid epidermal structures were formed, inhibitors and activators were added to the culture medium and their effects on the wound line and 3D cells produced were determined. It was noted that the number of spheroid structures increased significantly and cell-cell interactions became visible in the additional activator groups compared to the control groups. When the inhibitor-treated group was compared with the control groups, it was observed that the formed structures completely disappeared or decreased in amount and cell-cell interactions could not be established. In conclusion, this study offers an alternative to using laboratory animals to evaluate potential medicines and/or extracts in wound healing experiments.

References

Barbul A, Efron DT, Kavalukas SL. 2015. Wound healing. Brunicardi F, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, Pollock R.E. (Eds.), Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 10e. McGraw Hill. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=980&sectionid=59610850.

Bonnier F, Keating M, Wrobel TP, Majzner K, Baranska M, Garcia-Munoz A, et al. 2015. Cell viability assessment using the Alamar blue assay: a comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models. Toxicology in vitro, 29(1):124-131.

Choi SW, Yeh YC, Zhang Y, Sung HW, Xia Y. 2010. Uniform beads with controllable pore sizes for biomedical applications. Small, 6(14):1492-1498.

Daunton C, Kothari S, Smith L, Steele D. 2012. A history materials and practices for wound management. Wound Practice and Research, 20(4):174-85.

Dorsett-Martin WA. 2004. Rat models of skin wound healing: a review. Wound Repair Regen, 12: 591-599.

Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, et al. 2017. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology, 32(4):266-277.

Ekizoğlu O, Arıcan N. http://klinikgelisim.org.tr/eskisayi/klinik_2009_22/05.pdf

Ghahary A., Ghaffari A. 2007. Role of keratinocyte–fibroblast cross‐talk in development of hypertrophic scar. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 15, S46-S53.

Greenhalgh DG. 2005. Models of wound healing. J Burn Care Rehabil, 26:293-305.

Hudgens JL, Sugg KB, Grekin JA, Gumucio JP, Bedi A, Mendias CL. 2016 Platelet-Rich Plasma Activates Proinflammatory Signaling Pathways and Induces Oxidative Stress in Tendon Fibroblasts. Am J Sports Med., 44(8):1931-1940. doi: 10.1177/0363546516637176. Epub 2016 Jul 8. PMID: 27400714; PMCID: PMC4970921.

Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE. 2011. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends in Cell Biology, 21(12):745-754.

İnan NB, Duman N. 2020. Yeni ex vivo ve in vivo sikatris/ yara (dokusu) modelleri. Serarslan G, editör. Sikatris Tedavisine Güncel Yaklaşım. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri, p.66-70.

Jing X, Shi Q, Bi W, Zeng Z, Liang Y, Wu X, et al. 2014. Rifampicin protects PC12 cells from rotenone-induced cytotoxicity by activating GRP78 via PERK-eIF2alpha-ATF4 pathway. PLoS One, 9: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092110

Jonkman JEN, Cathcart JA, Xu F, Bartolini ME, Amon JE, Stevens KM, et al. 2014. An introduction to the wound healing assay using live-cell microscopy. Cell Adh Migr., 8:44-51.

Kaya M, Çevik A. 2011. Hayvan Deneylerinde Planlanma ve Model Seçimi. Deneysel Tıp Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(2):36-39.

Liang C-C, Park AY, Guan J-L. 2007. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc., 2:32-33.

Lin RZ, Chang HY. 2008. Recent advances in three‐dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology, 3(9‐10):1172-1184.

Mabry KM, Payne SZ, Anseth KS. 2016. Microarray analyses to quantify advantages of 2D and 3D hydrogel culture systems in maintaining the native valvular interstitial cell phenotype. Biomaterials, 2016;74:31-41.

Mazzoleni G, Di Lorenzo D, & Steimberg N. 2009. Modelling tissues in 3D: the next future of pharmaco-toxicology and food research?. Genes & Nutrition, 4(1):13.

Polat E. 2020. Üç boyutlu hücre kültürü sistemlerine güncel yaklaşımlar. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, 8(1):84-92.

Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. 2001. Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Probl Surg., 38(2):72-140.

Steinwachs J, Metzner C, Skodzek K, Lang N, Thievessen I, Mark C, et al. 2016. Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks. Nature Methods, 13(2):171.

Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. 2001. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen, 9(2):66-76.

Ud-Din S, and Bayat A. 2017. Non-animal models of wound healing in cutaneous repair: In silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of wounds and scars in human skin. Wound Rep and Reg, 25:164-176.

Weaver VM, Petersen, OW, Wang F, Larabell CA, Briand P, Damsky C, Bissell MJ. 1997. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. The Journal of Cell Biology, 137(1):231-245.

Wong VW, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. 2011. Surgical approaches to create murine models of human wound healing. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011:969618. Doi: 10.1155/2011/969618.

Yeğen B, Gören Z. 2005. Biyomedikal Araştırmalarda Deney Hayvanı: Temel Bilgiler ve Etik İlkeler; Yüce Yayımları.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

Akkaya, E. E., & Kul, O. (2025). In vitro 3D Spheroid Wound Modeling: An Alternative to Experimental Animal Studies. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research (IJVAR), 7(3), 59–65. Retrieved from https://www.ijvar.org/index.php/ijvar/article/view/620

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.